Skip to content

Get 50% off the C60 Trident Pro 600 in the new year sale!
Simply CLICK HERE to view the sale.

I’m sure you’re fairly well aware that I’m quite the fan of Christopher Ward watches. Not only are they a British company, which will ultimately get my support anyway, but they’re consistently releasing outstanding Swiss Made watches for the price. This is due to them being one of the first proper “online only” manufacturers – so they keep a low overhead.

Here latest release is a complete remake of their best selling watch, the excellent C60 Trident. This is now available in 4 variants; the Quartz, the standard auto, the GMT, and the COSC auto with their new in-house SH21 movement. 

The watch we’re looking at now is the auto, or should I say, the “Christopher Ward C60 Trident Pro 600“. It’ll cost you at least £600, which is a big step up in price from the last Trident auto. But, you do get a far superior watch. Let’s look a little closer to see why this is the case. 

The case

The case is described as being completely and comprehensively re-engineered, and is finished by hand. It also boasts a water resistance rating double of what it used to be, which is now 600m / 60ATM / 2000ft. Christopher Ward have changed their case manufacturer for the new Trident to be able to offer this. As always, the case is flawless in its execution, but the only significant differences easily discernible are the crown and caseback. The rest of the case is indeed remarkably manufactured, with the edges strong and the finishing sublime – but so was the existing Trident too.


The size of the Trident Pro 600 hasn’t changed a great deal from the original, with a very common and suitable diameter of 42mm. This provides an excellent amount of wrist presence that a watch like this rightly so demands. The height is about a third of a millimetre more, at 13.30mm (compared to the original being 13mm). This is most probably due to the increased depth rating – the case would most probably have to be thicker to withstand the extra pressure. This is still a perfectly reasonable height though, and because of the shape of the lugs, the whole watch fits snugly around the wrist and doesn’t sit too high and proud.


Lug to lug, the case is 51.5mm, which is fairly reasonable for a watch of this size. I believe this is due to the curved lugs “wrapping” themselves around the wrist. So if you have a 7″ wrist up, you’ll have no problem wearing it.


The new water resistance rating of 60ATM / 600m puts the Trident Pro in the same ball park as the Omega Seamster Planet Ocean and PloProf, and the Seiko Marinemaster Professional to name a few. So Christopher Ward are definitely making quite the statement of providing a watch with this rating costing only £600, compared to at least £2k plus. This rating means that you can take this watch scuba diving, and also compression diving. Not entirely sure how many of you will actually be doing this, but it’s pretty impressive nonetheless.

One of the main upgrades is the deep-stamped 3D back plate, which in all honesty really is a million times better than the previous offering, which was extremely lightly etched and seemed an afterthought. Now, though, the caseback reflects the price you’re paying – it’s an impressive, attractive facet of this watch. The 3D Trident motif is surrounded by waves, all with a great deal of detail and accuracy. Plus the watch details surrounding this are polished and high to raised against a mottled base. It’s much more like the kind of watches Christopher Ward are trying to compete against – much like an Omega caseback. It’s really good to see and adds to the quality feel of the watch.

trident600-10.jpg trident600-33.jpg

The sapphire crystal is 3.4mm thick (interestingly that’s down from 4mm on the original Trident), and has a super layer of anti-reflective coating applied to the underside. It works extremely well at reducing glare and reflections, which is again a welcome improvement, and again is the kind of impressive quality this watch is sure to provide. I imagine that the crystal looks even better on the white dial, as they usually naturally appear to reflect less anyway.


The bezel is another big feature. Made of Zirconia dioxide ceramic, it has a glossy finish that regular stainless steel inserts can’t provide. The fact that this is better than usual is instantly distinctive. The numerals and markings are all delicately engraved out of the top, which again looks very skilful and in turn, expensive. I opted to review the maroon colour, which in my eyes is a real stunner – it’s brings a lovely splash of colour to the watch and also a sense of luxury too. The bezel action is smooth, easy to use, and makes a satisfying loud clicking noise as you rotate it. The grip is fairly shallow, but is sufficient to manipulate the bezel.

trident600-30.jpg trident600-29.jpg

The crown is one more serious update. It’s plain to see that it’s been completely remade and remodelled. It’s a much more brawny affair, with big, thick teeth for grip and a concoction of brushed, polished and bead basted finishing. It’s worth noting that using this crown is lovely too – you get the feeling of refinement, quality and sturdiness when adjusting the time. The end is pleasantly engaging too, with the contrast and precision between the polished CW logo and the blasted rest creating quite an unusual but attractive appearance.

trident600-31.jpg trident600-11.jpg

The case in general is completed to a very high level with immaculate fit and finish. You can’t really say anything negative about it – it looks great, feels great, and is made flawlessly.


The dial

As has always been, the guilloche wave pattern on the dial is subtle yet visually stunning. It provides a charming and interesting level of depth to the dial which is very pleasing to the eye. The level of accuracy demonstrated on these waves are very impressive.


The hour and minute hands are exactly the same as on the original Trident. The minute hand is a long sword shape, and the hour hand is a distinctive onion shape. Both are pitched, which provides a variety of reflections depending on the angle of wear, and have skeletonised bases, making sure they don’t take up too much dial real estate. The second hand is different, and in my mind is a much needed improvement. Instead of being a plain thin point with a red tip, it now has a lumed disc located where the base of the hour markers are. This means the seconds hand is now visible in the dark, but I also think it looks more interesting. The second hand still dons the wonderful trident counterweight, an excellent little design cue tying the watch together. Of course, the hands are all made with high precision and are all completely flawless.


The hour markers are also different. They’ve decided to combine the C65, the much dressier Trident, in with the C60 by including its baton hour markers, over the original disc shaped ones. This does indeed increase the elegance of the design, especially thanks to how thin and tall they are.


The date window is still as precise as ever, delivering a splendid and intricate border to the date wheel, but it now welcomes a new, more charming position – at none other than 3. For me, I was never bothered by the existing 4 o’clock date window position. But for some, they simply did not like it. So now, there’s less to be repelled with, so it should appeal to many more. It’s also good that one the White dial Trident, Christopher Ward have also used a white date wheel to match.


The printing on the dial is all done with pin-point accuracy, with no sign of smudging or blurry edging. There’s not a great deal, just the logo in the top half, the name and specs in the bottom half, and then the outer minute track and the words “Swiss Made” at the foot of the dial. 

The lume has also had an overhaul. Now, the Trident Pro sports SuperLuminova SLN-T-C1 – and you can definitely tell the difference. What has always been a bit of a bugbear for me and many others, is now a major strength. The Lume is so much stronger than I’m used to seeing on a Christopher Ward. It’s such a great surprise, and also adds to the higher quality timepiece they’re aiming for.


On the whole, I believe the alterations to the dial have made the design stronger. It’s all made to a high level of standard that is equivalent to a high end timepiece too.


The movement

Christopher award are still jiggling between the two calibres of the ETA 2824-2 and the Sellita SW200-1. For many people, this is a massive turn off as you never really know which movement you end up with, unless you PPP the back open. To be completely frank, it doesn’t matter at all – they’re basically the same movement. In fact, I’d even sway towards the Sellita thanks to its extra jewel in the winding mechanism and also the fact that it’s made on newer equipment. The ETAs are all made on a lot of original machines, so some think they won’t be quite as neat and tidy as the Sellitas, which are made on much newer ones. For some, though, just the name ETA is worth much more. Obviously it has the history, and a long-standing amount of time behind it as being a solid, reliable movement. There’s no denying that. But, a lot of ETAs in the past have actually been contracted out to Sellita – so what’s labelled as an ETA in another watch could have been made by Sellita. Intriguing, but in real life, they both perform just as well as each other.


They both sport the usual specs: 42 hour power reserve, high beat of 28.8k bph (a smooth 8 ticks per second), hacking seconds, hand and automatic winding. They both can be insanely accurate if regulated correctly too. 

Accuracy-wise, it’s proved to be great. In fact, just within COSC specs – it’s been +4 seconds in 24 hours, which is definitely accurate enough for a watch that isn’t COSC certified.

So there we have it – the Trident Pro 600 will contain a great, dependable movement no matter which one is within it. And even if it does go awry, Christopher Ward have their ludicrous and unheard of 5 year warrantee to back you up. 

The bracelet

The bracelet is more or less exactly the same as the previous one. It measures in at 22mm wide at the lugs, reducing down to 18mm at the buckle.


It maintains the design, with a polished centre link which is flanked by brushed outer links with polished edges. This provides a pleasant array of finishing, although you do need to be careful with the polished links – they do tend to gather hairline scratches quite easily.


The buckle itself is a classic affair, a plain and folded brushed stainless steel top with the CW logo deeply engraved towards the top. Running down the sides are the two polished release buttons, pleasantly made, sitting proud, and very easy to use.


A vital improvement is that the micro adjustment actually works on the latest version of the buckle. The original one was stupid in that whilst the holes were there, you couldn’t actually move the bracelet as one way would show the ugly underside of the divers extension, and the other way would impede the buckle actually closing. 

The buckle also features a divers extension, so you can flap it open and have extra length applied to the bracelet immediately to get it around your wet suit. This is a definite must considering the depth the Trident Pro 600 is rated at. But, thankfully this has all been rectified.

The one thing is really dislike about this bracelet is the new pin and collar system used to secure the links together. I’m serious, it was literally the longest I’ve ever spent resizing a bracelet – ever. Why they decided against standard pins I have no idea. The collar sites within the centre link, and you then push the link through the whole width to secure it. But, the fit is so tight it was a real nightmare to remove and put the pins back in place.

Even with that one negative, it’s still an improvement on the original bracelet. As you’d expect, the entire bracelet is impeccably made, and I believe the 4mm difference from the lug to the bracelet works in its favour too, creating a classier appearance due to it being not overly chunky or too over the top, plus increasing comfort.


The competition

The main rival I feel is the Steinhart Ocean 1 Premium. With a matching ceramic bezel, it’s of a similar stock to the Trident Pro 600. However, if it’s made of the same case as the standard Ocean 1, I can’t help but feel that it would feel of lesser quality. Of course, it is much cheaper – it’s priced at €550 / £410. But with that you get half the depth rating (300m), and what is essentially a straight up homage to the Rolex Submariner.


The on other end of the spectrum, there’s the Tudor Black Bay, which Christopher award like to see as a more direct comparison. Costing upwards from £2500, it is a beautiful watch there’s no doubt about it. It is excellently made, and has received a lot of positive comments. But is a watch with similar spec and build quality worth 4 times the price? Only you can answer that.


Final comments

The Christopher Ward Trident has always been a winner and a stand-out watch in its price range. Now, although it has stepped up in price, it’s still great value. This is because it’s such a higher calibre watch. When you hold the new and old side by side, you can genuinely tell the difference. Not only is the spec and feel much improved (such as the depth rating, ceramic bezel, and new crown and caseback), but for many, the design is much more appealing too, with the more conventional date at 3 and smarter baton hour markers.

There’s no doubt about it that the Trident Pro 600 is a class watch. Were you to buy one, you’d not be disappointed in the slightest. It certainly pinches well above its weight.


trident600-25.jpg trident600-2.jpg trident600-24.jpg


facebook twitter linkedin
View comments 16


  1. Joseph Napolitano

    Great review and wonderful pictures. I’m sure that video alone is going to generate a bunch of sales. That red looks so much better than I thought it would with a blue suit. They really go well together and I would have thought otherwise. It looks incredible.

  2. Request: pics of c60 Trident Pro 600

    […] Ward Pro 600 GMT Christopher Ward C60 Trident Pro 600 Watch Review | Watch It All About Christopher Ward C60 TRIDENT PRO 600 Review – Outside Context There's loads more at the CW forum. […]

  3. peterlonz

    Great review, thorough & detailed with a wide range of high quality pics & a video.
    The Watch itself is stunning in appearance. You can’t instinctively not like it!

    I would like to know more about the ceramic bezel which is plainly an outstanding feature of this watch.
    I know it looks great, but how well does it cope with knocks bumps, & the inevitable abrasion of every day use?

    I wish the price point for the quartz movement version had been mentioned, IMHO very wise to offer a quartz version, assume it looks identical or is the case shallower?

    I agree with the points raised about the bracelet!
    In doubt about the high pressure rating, who needs that certainly not scuba divers?
    If cost & case depth could be reduced for a 200m version I would think that should be considered.


    […] Here latest release is a complete remake of their best selling watch, the excellent C60 Trident. This is now available in 4 variants; the Quartz, the standard auto, the GMT, and the COSC auto with their new in-house SH21 movement. Read more > […]

  5. Nigel

    Thank you for a very useful review. After recently selling my lovely Zenith El Primero (long story) I set out to buy a Rolex Submariner but in the end I just could not live with the idea of spending such a huge amount of money on a watch, it also seemed to be a bit of a cliche – ‘look at me with my Rolex Sub etc etc’ which is definitely not me as I like to be a bit ‘different’! I then looked at and tried on the 2015 Tudor Pelagos. It is a truly lovely watch and I was soooo close to spending my ‘hard earnt’ on it but by pure chance I started to notice glowing review after glowing review about the new Christopher Ward C60 Trident 600 range and in particular the new COSC version with their new SH21 movement (This review was the one that finally made up my mind). Given that I wanted a high quality COSC certified watch the Christopher Ward ticked all the boxes and it came in at half the price of the Tudor!

    Being a product innovator myself I also really liked the way that Christoper Ward & Synergies Horologères, both young companies, together with Johannes Jahnke, are shaking up the ‘establishment’ and the established way of working. I understand how hard that is to achieve so I wanted to do my bit to support them. Given that Johannes is young and relatively speaking at the start of his watchmaking career I am sure that they will become highly sought after in the future if he continues in his current vein. Given all the above I have just placed my order and parted with my ‘hard earnt’ 🙂

    If anyone is interested I will let you know if my faith in innovation, innovators, and on-line reviews pays off when I receive my watch!

    Oh, and a special thank you to for the link and the discount code – it saved me over £200!!

  6. Mike

    I have one of these c600. Nothing but a piece of junk. Ran fast by 50 sec then the stem/ crown came right off in my hand while I was winding it. I really wish in hind sight I would have gone with a more reputable brand. A tag is only a few dollars more. Plus you can get it serviced in the USA which has been a huge Hassle with this watch. The whole experience sucks.

    1. Phil

      Luckily you have a 5 year warranty. Send it back and CW will take care of you. Tag quality isn’t all that either.

      1. Steve

        My Tag had a problem, it was sent off and returned within 3 weeks… Nearly at 3 months waiting for my C60 to be repaied with CWL, not happy.

        1. Mark

          I really wanted a Trident Pro, lusted after it for months. Eventually decided I’d go for it but fired off a few questions first to CWL via the website, just basic stuff re strap choice etc. That was 2 months ago, no reply yet. Totally put me off, especially after reading the level of CS some of you have received. Camera gear instead.

  7. Mike

    Don’t buy this watch. I have one and the quality is horrible. Crown separated from the stem (no it is not a solid piece), not accurate at about 50sec fast per day and of course no USA service. To top it all off they lost it when I sent back so I am out my money. No brand recognition to boot. Save your money for an established brand and mature company. Your welcome.

  8. BidDaddy

    Most of the reviews here are very positive. I wanted to provide an account of a different experience with CWL to provide some balance.
    I was in the market for a nice looking watch I could wear daily. I have a Rolex that I don’t feel comfortable leaving in my locker at the health club, working around the house, etc. I had never heard of CWL until a colleague of mine at work gave me some options for a “good” daily watch and CLW was on his list. He is a watch hobbyist and provided several “micobrands” to check out. I realized with CLW I would be buying a watch with very little general brand recognition but I got comfortable with the quality from all the on line reviews and felt the C600 Trident met my purpose.
    I purchased the C600 in February 2015. The initial watch got stuck in USPS Chicago Customs in route to Texas. When it did not clear customs after 6 weeks, CWL had to reship a replacement 2nd day air at their expense. To clean up this ominous beginning to my saga, the original watch arrived a couple weeks later. I promptly sent it back without ever opening the package. It cost me roughly $35 but since they had sent me a watch 2nd day air when I was anxious to get the watch I figured that was a small additional price to pay.

    The watch was nice looking although maybe a little thicker than comparable Tags, Rolexes, Tudor, etc.
    Problem One. The watch ran fast almost 50 sec per day. I waited a couple months to see if it would get better but it did not. I took it to a repair shop here in Texas where I have a relationship and for a minimal price they adjusted the timing while I waited. I did not want to go through the hassle of repackaging, going to the post office and waiting another couple months for the watch to be returned so I opted for local repair and absorbed an additional $50 dollars in costs.
    Problem Two. While winding the watch couple months later, the crown came right off in my hand. (see attached picture). I am not a watch hobbyist and had always assumed this was a solid part. I found it ironic since this is one of the main features that give the watch its strong masculine look. The same watch maker put it back on- another additional $35.
    About 2 months later, the stem came off again. This time the watchmaker said he would have to get a new part as the method he was using was obviously not going to work long term and he did not want me to have any more problems.
    Problem three. CLW would not supply part, even though the watchmaker (auth. Rolex) knew exactly what was needed. The only option left was to send the watch back to CLW London.
    I sent the watch back this spring. Yes another trip to the post office and another $30. I knew from various forums the CWL repair process was running about 8 weeks. When I did not hear anything from them I contacted them to learn they never received the watch.
    Problem Four. Now I am out $900.
    The lesson here is don’t buy anything you cannot get serviced locally. This could have all been avoided if CLW would just provide parts. Maybe adequate quality control on their end, the watch had numerous issues, would have prevented it as well. Spend a little more money and get a major brand! I could have had a Tag with several thousands of repair shops in the USA with access to parts.
    Good Luck whichever way you go, but now whenever my friend gives out his micro brand list – I balance it with a different perspective. Not at all mad at him, I should have known better!

  9. Phil

    Any particular reason you keep leaving the same remarks Mike / BidDaddy? Oh and BTW, it’s CWL, not CLW.

  10. Mark

    Nice looking watch, shame they don’t answer enquiries on their site contact form

  11. Steve

    I too am the proud owner of a Vintage C60 Trident Pro 600, and I am totaly devastated that it’s been with CWL, getting repaired, since the begining of September.
    Yesterday I received another apologetic email stating a further 2 weeks may be required, taking the total time I have been without my watch to a nice round 3 months!
    I bought my C60 back in October 2015 and wore it pretty much daily until it stopped whilst on my hols, in August this year. What I have asked CWL is, why not just replace instead of taking so long over repairs?
    Such poor CS has soured my views of this company, and to think I was on the verge of buying the even more beautiful C1000 Typhoon Cockpit Edition……

  12. Jonathan Fudge

    An excellent review, many thanks.

  13. david

    Good old British quality. Remember the Japanese built Acura Legend and British Sterling 800? Both similar cars with some minor mechanical/engineering differences, but wow the difference in reliability was humongous.

    “Early build quality of the 800 was demonstrably poor as measured by J.D. Power. The various problems included issues with interior trim, problematic Lucas electronics, and paintwork. Corrosion problems in early models would also mar its reputation. All of this contributed to the eventual demise of Rover in the United States. The Sterling fell to the bottom of J.D. Power surveys, while ironically its twin, the Japanese-built Acura Legend, had enjoyed top rankings its first year.”

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most popular articles



Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors